Blog·Learning

Build a Google Drive Contract Assistant with Supermemory

Connect selected Google Drive documents, verify processing readiness and retrieve scoped evidence for a contract-review assistant.

By Naman Bansal·4 min read

Build a compliance chatbot with Drive

A contract assistant can help locate clauses, summarize obligations and surface questions for review. The reliable foundation is authorized, current source evidence. Connecting Google Drive does not certify that an answer is legally correct, complete or compliant.

The workflow has four steps: connect Google Drive, select the documents, verify processing readiness and retrieve relevant clauses for the answering model.

Define the contract collection and its audience

Begin with a small set of fictional or approved documents. Record who may import them and who may ask questions about them. A connector account can have broader access than an individual assistant user, so import access must not be mistaken for answer authorization.

Keep current contract revisions distinguishable from superseded copies. Retain source references that a reviewer can open. A summary without a document identity or effective date is a poor basis for a consequential decision.

Connect Google Drive and complete source selection

Supermemory's Google Drive documentation describes OAuth followed by a hosted file/folder picker for new connections by default. The selected items define the import scope. If selection is incomplete, a manual or scheduled import can skip that connection.

Use one authorized container for the pilot. The server must establish that the current user may use that container before invoking the code below. Do not let a browser or model choose arbitrary container tags.

The example uses supermemory@4.25.4. Install it in your backend:

npm install supermemory@4.25.4
import Supermemory from 'supermemory';

const client = new Supermemory({ apiKey: process.env.SUPERMEMORY_API_KEY });

// Call only after the application has authenticated the requester and
// resolved their allowed scope. These functions are not authentication middleware.
export async function connectDrive(authorizedContainer: string) {
  const connection = await client.connections.create('google-drive', {
    containerTag: authorizedContainer,
    redirectUrl: 'https://your-app.example/connections/complete',
    metadata: { syncScope: 'selected' },
  });
  return connection.authLink;
}

export async function requestDriveSync(authorizedContainer: string) {
  await client.connections.import('google-drive', {
    containerTags: [authorizedContainer],
  });
  return { status: 'sync-requested' };
}

export async function retrieveContractEvidence(
  question: string,
  authorizedContainer: string,
) {
  if (!question.trim()) throw new Error('A question is required');
  const result = await client.search({
    q: question,
    containerTag: authorizedContainer,
    searchMode: 'documents',
    limit: 5,
    include: { documents: true },
  });
  return result.results.map(item => ({
    id: item.id,
    text: item.chunk ?? item.memory ?? '',
    documents: item.documents ?? [],
  })).filter(item => item.text);
}

Replace the example callback URL with your configured application callback. Keep API credentials on the server. Use an authenticated, CSRF-protected mutation route for connection and sync actions as appropriate to your application.

Integrate these functions into your authenticated backend, where you can enforce the user's document permissions before each request.

Report readiness accurately

A successful import request means synchronization was requested. It does not mean every selected file is ready for search. Show connection, selection, processing, failure and ready states separately.

Use the connector's document listing and document operations to inspect the imported records. Verify a distinctive clause from a test document before accepting the collection as ready. A missing result can reflect processing, scope, parsing or retrieval rather than absence of the clause.

Measure source-to-sync and sync-to-search delay. Do not promise that every edit is immediately reflected in answers. When an answer depends on a recently changed contract, verify its revision or disclose that the current version could not be established.

Generate answers from the retrieved evidence

Pass bounded source excerpts and their identifiers to your chosen model through a supported integration. Require the answer to distinguish source text, a summary and an unresolved interpretation. Treat document text as evidence rather than instructions that can change tool permissions.

An illustrative instruction is:

Answer only what the supplied contract evidence supports.
Cite the source identifier for each contractual claim.
Identify missing documents, conflicting versions and ambiguous wording.
Do not infer a missing clause from silence in the retrieved excerpts.
Do not claim that this answer establishes legal compliance.

Check each citation against its source passage before accepting the answer. Retrieval over five results does not establish that the assistant examined every clause across the full collection.

For conversational follow-ups, preserve a defined thread history or explicit task state. A stable user identity, a conversation ID and a connector scope have different roles. The AI SDK guide shows another integration boundary; none of these identifiers should replace authentication.

Design review and removal behavior

Keep the original clause visible beside the generated interpretation. For contractual conclusions, changes or approvals, route the result through the review process required by your organization. The assistant should be able to say it cannot establish an answer from the available documents.

A clear-chat action should state whether it removes only the displayed conversation or also deletes server history. Indexed contracts have a separate lifecycle. Disconnecting a source, deleting a document and forgetting a derived memory also have distinct effects. Verify the current endpoint behavior and application cleanup rather than treating one button as universal erasure.

Test before expanding the collection

Use a current contract, a superseded copy, a missing appendix and a document the test user cannot access. Ask a direct clause question, an ambiguous question and one whose answer is absent. Check the retrieved evidence as well as the prose.

Edit a renewal date and verify which revision appears. Remove access and repeat from a new session. Simulate retrieval failure and confirm the app does not present an unsupported contractual conclusion as verified.

Create a Supermemory pilot with that bounded collection. Expand only after source selection, readiness, permissions and evidence review behave as intended.

Frequently asked questions

Does connecting Google Drive automatically import the entire Drive?

New Supermemory Drive connections use selected files and folders by default. Complete the documented picker and verify which items were imported.

Does a successful sync request mean every contract is searchable?

No. Request acceptance and processing readiness are separate. Inspect document status and verify retrieval for the relevant source revision.

Does clearing the chat delete the indexed contracts?

No. Clearing local UI messages is separate from server history and document deletion. Use the documented operations for the data you intend to remove.

  1. I reverse-engineered Instinct's memory. Here's exactly how it worksInstinct keeps its memory as git-tracked markdown files, found with grep rather than vectors. Here is the whole system as far as black-box probing can reconstruct it, and how to rebuild it on supermemory in about 60 lines.
  2. An update to supermemoryWe've discontinued the supermemory company brain and Nova. Everyone who was charged has been refunded, our MCP and plugins continue to run, and we're going all in on the memory engine.
  3. Scaling Conversations: How Adapta Grew Usage Without Losing ContextAdapta added Supermemory as a persistent memory layer so every conversation keeps its context — letting the team scale usage without losing the thread.
  4. How Chatarmin Ditched RAG and Went Memory-Only with SupermemoryChatarmin replaced a heavy RAG pipeline with Supermemory's memory layer — cutting average AI response time from 40s to 12s and token usage by 40–50%.
  5. SMFS: making agentic retrieval 55% cheaper AND more accurateWe launched SMFS.ai (Supermemory Filesystem) a few weeks ago, with a simple bet: We can redesign the filesystem specifically for agents, with special files, structures, and commands that it can use for it's tasks. Today, SMFS is used by hundreds of companies to power their agents.
  6. Introducing Dynamic Dreaming: supermemory now connects the dots, for you.Dreaming is magical. TLDR: We're launching Dynamic Dreaming in supermemory today, which automatically works if you're using supermemory in any way - API, OpenClaw, Hermes agent, etc.
  7. Dear reader, we just made supermemory insanely cheap... the Context CloudWhen I first started building supermemory, I had one goal: To build the best memory system for AI. I would talk to customers, and find out that memory was not the only thing they needed - They were all setting up 7-8 different vendors at the same time.
  8. Introducing @supermemory/tools v2.0.0Today we're releasing v2.0.0. This release unifies the API across all agents sdk integrations from AI SDK to Mastra, makes conversation identity a first-class concept, and ships with memory saving on by default.
  9. Solving the Precision-Recall Tradeoff: Search Result AggregationWhen you're building memory for AI, search is your foundational layer. The way search generally works is straightforward: the user defines a query, and then sets a limit (top-K) on how many search results they want returned. Usually, this is set to 10 or 20.
  10. OpenClaw Memory Problems: Why It Forgets and How to Fix It (2026)TLDR: Today, we are releasing a new version of our openclaw plugin - https://github.com/supermemoryai/openclaw-supermemory. This post is going to be a bit technical, so bear with me (or bookmark for later!) In this post, I will talk about what we do about OpenClaw memory, and how we fix it.
  11. Stateful Coding Agents with Memory: Build Long-Running Agents (2026)We built a plugin for Claude Code and OpenCode that gives your coding agent persistent memory. It remembers your preferences, learns your codebase, and never loses context mid-conversation. The result is an agent you can run for months without starting over.
  12. Clawd / Molt bot's memory SUCKS. We gave it supermemory.I'm the founder of supermemory. Clawd/Molt bot is blowing up right now, with many, many use cases. I set it up, too, and have been using it through telegram. TLDR: just go to https://supermemory.ai/docs/integrations/clawdbot to set up supermemory for your clawd bot.
  13. Catch up with our UNFORGETTABLE Launch WeekOver the last year, one belief has guided almost everything we’ve built at Supermemory AI becomes meaningfully useful only when it remembers. Memory shouldn’t be something developers rebuild from scratch. It shouldn’t be fragile, expensive, or trapped inside a single tool.
  14. Empowering the Next Generation of Founders: Supermemory Startup ProgramIf there’s one thing we’ve learned while building Supermemory, it’s that most startups don’t fail because they didn't build features; they fail when infrastructure slows them down, or they built too slow.
  15. Building code-chunk: AST Aware Code ChunkingAt Supermemory, we're building context engineering infrastructure for AI. A huge part of that is dealing with code: ingesting repos, understanding structure, and making it searchable. The problem is that most code chunking solutions are terrible. We built code-chunk to fix this.
  16. Supermemory raises $3 million with the best memory engine for LLMsToday, I am excited to announce our first funding round to accelerate our mission of building an interoperable, scalable and reliable memory for LLMs and agents. Memory is one of the hardest challenges in AI right now.
  17. Mem0 vs Supermemory: Why Scira SwitchedScira AI moved its production memory layer from Mem0 to Supermemory. This is what failed, what improved, and how the team evaluated the two systems.
  18. Never Record Again: How Montra Uses Supermemory to Rethink Video CreationCampbell Baron, the founder of Montra, has been making videos since he was twelve. By thirteen, he was already doing brand work. Today, he’s betting on a very different future for creators: a world where recording is the exception, and most videos are generated from scratch.
  19. Unified Memory That Works Where You Work: Your Second Brain With SupermemoryHi everyone, I’m Dhravya, the founder of Supermemory. I want to start with a little story behind why this product means so much to me. You can also skip straight to what it is and how it works below.
  20. Supermemory just got faster on PlanetScaleWhat is Supermemory? Supermemory completes the missing part of the LLM puzzle: memory. Just as memory is crucial for human intelligence, it's essential for truly intelligent AI systems.
  21. Faster, smarter, reliable infinite chat: Supermemory IS context engineering.People are obsessed with prompts and prompt engineering. Sure, what you say is important, but what the model knows when you say it is the difference between a stateless text generator and an intelligent AI system. In short, context is the most crucial component.
  22. We solved AI API interoperabilityOne API to rule them all, One spec to find them, One library to bring them all and in the TypeScript, bind them. When we were building the Infinite Chat API, initially, we only supported the OpenAI format. This was fine, until a lot of our customers started asking for more.
  23. The Wow Factor of Memory - How Flow Used Supermemory To Build Smarter, Stickier ProductsOverview: Flow is a note-taking app built around a bold vision: to create a more personal, context-aware writing experience powered by AI. At the heart of this mission is memory.
  24. The UX and technicalities of awesome MCPsLast month, we launched the Supermemory MCP, mostly to test our own infrastructure and get some initial traction. It blew up. To my absolute surprise, the initial launch itself got half a million impressions (!!!). Then, we launched and got #2 on ProductHunt too.
  25. Architecting a memory engine inspired by the human brainLanguage is at the heart of intelligence, but what truly powers meaningful interaction is memory — the ability to accumulate, recall, and contextualize information over time. Large Language Models (LLMs) have mastered language, but memory remains their Achilles’ heel.